Effects of Cultural Practices on Wildlife Diversity and Abundance

Effects of Cultural Practices on Wildlife Diversity and Abundance

The research on wildlife diversity focuses on the variety of species found in an ecosystem. Entails disciplines like animal diversity, including ensuring genetically diversified and healthy livestock while also taking into account universal diversity as well as ecosystem diversity. The component of Biodiversity encompasses a variety of factors, not just species variety. One is the genetic diversity that emerges within organisms and the diversification of the whole habitat taken into account if we are to catalogue all life on Earth. Two, a species' genetic kind of diversity is the amount of variation in its genes. When trying to grasp the concept of genetic diversity, picturing a dog can be a useful aid. There are genetic differences between Chihuahuas and Great Danes, even though all dogs belong to the same genus. Reckon on all the different sizes, colours, shapes, and patterns that dogs have in their genetic diversity.  Three, the diversity of ecosystems, which includes natural communities, as well as habitats, is referred to as ecological biodiversity. According to the species that populate each ecosystem, but also temperature involved and precipitation, for example, Maine's rainforest varies from Colorado’s woodlands. Despite their superficial resemblance, these two ecosystems have a great deal in common. This paper seeks to critically assess and discuss the effect of cultural practices on wildlife diversity and abundance. 

Importance of Diversity 

Biodiversity is critical to the well-being of both humans and the natural world’s wellness and happiness (Naeem et al., 2016). All kinds of food and substances are obtained from it, as well as money for the economy. Malls and stores would be much less shocked if we did not have a wide variety of pollinators, crops, and soils. Study into plants or animals’ biology variations and genetics has led to many medical breakthroughs that have helped cure and extend life span. Since genetic diversity was destroyed when species are extinct, humans would not know or understand if new vaccines or drugs on discovery. Life on this planet is possible because of the ecological services provided by biodiversity. In addition to filtering water and insulation chemicals, reservoirs also produce oxygen, one of the so many benefits plants provide to humans. Fires and flooding can disrupt ecosystems if there is a lack of biodiversity (Yule, 2010, Pg. 393-409). 

Linguistic diversity is also inclusive in influencing wildlife biodiversity and its abundance. Humankind's destiny will be brighter if we embrace cultural diversity as an initial source of advancement, creativity, and transfer. You do not need to preserve ethnic differences as an immutable deposit, but rather as a setting for ongoing, unification conversation between all manifestations of identity (Van der Westhuizen and Maree, 2010, pp.54-62). Acknowledging this everyday dialogue as a foundational principle should be a top priority in preserving our wildlife biodiversity. Diversity and discussion are mutually reinforcing each other. It is impossible to break the chain of cause and effect that connects them without endangering the long-term viability of development. Because of the experience, a universal dialect that one can speak and the other understands is evident.  

In an attempt to comprehend and define wildlife biodiversity and associated processes, we must have a diverse vocabulary that reflects our cultural as well as linguistic diversity. Each group of languages has a distinct understanding of the sceneries of their respective regions, as well as the conversations between these sceneries and the people who live in them. Indigenous knowledge and experience, techniques, procedures, and advancements are preserved and passed down to future generations thanks to the splendour of multilingualism, which contributes to the preservation of cultural components passed down from lineage. Because cultures, such as individuals, experience an inimitable part of their humanity in each other, this type of diversity results in the identification of characteristics common to everyone. As a result, cultural diversity brings people, groups, and nations together. 

One cannot separate wildlife and biocultural diversity because they are interrelated and reliant upon each other. No protection for natural environments without an understanding of the human cultural practices contexts that always shape them (Pretty, 2011, pp.127-139). Each culture has its unique characterizations, understanding, and procedures that are distinct from those of other cultures. Leadership, as well as human behaviour about the surroundings, is a joint activity that expresses culture. The perseverance of social-ecological structures depends on the coexistence of both cultural and biological differences. 

Biological and cultural diversity are closely related. On one side, the survival and articulation of countless cultural norms are dependent on specific aspects of biodiversity. Ethnic communities are responsible for developing, maintaining, and managing significant arrays of wildlife biodiversity and abundance, using language and understanding to the means of management (Burton,1992, pp.225-237). One instance of this cultural force is the incredible variety of domestic animals and plant varieties established and preserved by cultures all over the world. Numerous domestic plant types are widely found in tropical agricultural structures, including a wide range of varieties tailored to specific climatic and cultural contexts. 

What makes it so crucial for the preservation of specific cultures as well as biodiversity to coexist is knowledge. Indigenous understanding that is rooted in the local dialect provides a direct link between diverse cultures and biodiversity. Wildlife biodiversity is born and cultivated by cultural contexts, which are the source of its wisdom (Cunningham, 2014). Cultural diversity is not merely a storehouse of antiquity preserved for posterity's sake. A site that encourages a constant flow of unifying discourse open to all expressions of identity. The importance of preserving and recognizing everyday dialogue as a foundational principle should get emphasis. 

Both wildlife biodiversity and openness are connected (Huang et al., 2021). When the causal link is broken, sustainability is threatened. We can all speak or comprehend a shared language of diverse cultures when we cultivate that interdependency. Since cultures and individuals alike experience an inimitable part of their civilization in others, this definition of diversity shed light on the aspects of alienation that exist within the self. As opposed to just being divisive, ethnic diversity brings people together by allowing them to share a common heritage, present-day experiences, and future hopes and dreams which is an advantage for wildlife and abundance. To ensure the long-term viability of advancement, all entities must contribute to and benefit from a common fund. 

Both animals and plants together with other life forms in wildlife biodiversity have evolved into a wide variety of species that can thrive in a variety of surroundings and form ecologies because of nature's laws (Manchester and Bullock, 2000, pp.845-864). Because of the variability of living things and the ecologies in that, they have thrived for millennia; biological diversity seems to have been essential to their survival, sustainable development, and wellbeing. Community as a whole has advanced to cope with the complexity of our changing natural surroundings. Natural as well as cultural resources available have defined all people’s lives, societies, and cultures. Biological diversity has provided the foundation for a wide range of human civilizations and organizations, including governmental, religious, socio-cultural, and economic structures. Biocultural diversity is inseparable. Most people believe that wildlife diversity should be valued about human differences, as varying cultures and individuals from distinct parts of the world perceive and understand biodiversity in diverse ways. It is impossible to separate human diversity from nature's diversification. Individuals and our earth's natural economic success depend on these resources. 

Wildlife biodiversity is also influenced by religious practices. Throughout human history, we have seen how powerful nations have expanded the reach of their dialects, cultures, and products to new nations, continents, and territories, altering people's daily lives and the structure of government. The globalization of today is unique because of its speed and force, endorsed by technological advances in communication, transportation, trade, and many other aspects of our age. One-third of the world's population is forced to despoil natural resources in their desperate attempt to find food and water, while air pollution ruins forests as well as floods coastal areas, altering agriculture in negative ways and threatening ethnic differences. They have developed a set of values and beliefs that allow them to coexist peacefully with nature and protect the rich variety of life around which they rely upon. Indigenous individuals' productive practices and spiritual beliefs are shaped by the species-varying surroundings of the world. Since the ancient period, local peoples have made use of and preserved the diverse range of genetics, species, and ecologies (Anthwal et al., 2010. pp.962-971). The lifestyle is dependent on the preservation of biodiversity. In many cases, indigenous peoples' cultural as well as religious beliefs and conventional spirituality prevent depletion of natural resources and maintain the structures in which they live to their advantage and that of coming generations. Most traditional societies have a strong belief in biodiversity conservation. 

In conclusion, a consideration for factors that contribute to the well-being of humankind and the earth's natural ecosystem should prevail. There needs to be an appreciation that many of the issues of biodiversity loss, cultural decline, and rate of poverty intertwine, and thus necessitate a more systematic and integrated strategy for intervention at all stages. Policy initiatives, implementation strategies, and legal tools can all be developed and implemented after a procedure of policy discussions has taken place. Moreover, we need to find and implement ways and methods of promoting a new moral code of ecological sustainability and protection.                             

References

Anthwal, A., Gupta, N., Sharma, A., Anthwal, S. and Kim, K.H., 2010. Conserving biodiversity through traditional beliefs in sacred groves in Uttarakhand Himalaya, India. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 54(11), pp.962-971. 

Burton, P.J., Balisky, A.C., Coward, L.P., Kneeshaw, D.D. and Cumming, S.G., 1992. The value of managing for biodiversity. The forestry chronicle, 68(2), pp.225-237. 

Cunningham, A.B., 2014. Applied ethnobotany: people, wild plant use and conservation. Routledge. Yule, C.M., 2010. Loss of biodiversity and ecosystem functioning in Indo-Malayan peat swamp forests. Biodiversity and conservation, 19(2), pp.393-409. 

Huang, Q., Wang, F., Yang, H., Valitutto, M. and Songer, M., 2021. Will the COVID-19 outbreak be a turning point for China's wildlife protection: New developments and challenges of wildlife conservation in China. Biological Conservation, 254, p.108937. 

Lecq, S., Loisel, A., Brischoux, F., Mullin, S.J. and Bonnet, X., 2017. Importance of ground refuges for the biodiversity in agricultural hedgerows. Ecological Indicators, 72, pp.615-626. 

Naeem, S., Chazdon, R., Duffy, J.E., Prager, C. and Worm, B., 2016. Biodiversity and human well-being: an essential link for sustainable development. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 283(1844), p.20162091. 

Van der Westhuizen, C.N. and Maree, J.G., 2010. From human to humankind: Facilitating global awareness among the gifted. Gifted Education International, 27(1), pp.54-62. 

Manchester, S.J. and Bullock, J.M., 2000. The impacts of non‐native species on UK biodiversity and the effectiveness of control. Journal of Applied Ecology, 37(5), pp.845-864. 

Pretty, J., 2011. Interdisciplinary progress in approaches to address social-ecological and ecocultural systems. Environmental Conservation, 38(2), pp.127-139.